This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
As a highschool history teacher, whenever I meet new adults and we talk about our professions, I often find myself being met with a familiar reaction: "I disliked the subject in school, but now I find it interesting." I often weave these historical narratives into content through primarysources.
Teams from the USHMM and the Rowan Center developed and deployed and then gathered feedback about these projects from a number of stakeholders, including scholars, museum professionals, middle and highschool teachers, college students and a general audience.
I vaguely remember the same practice from back when I was in highschool. They were our primarysource of relevant information, after all. For decades, we have conveniently dodged the question often asked by eager students in highschool math spaces: “When am I going to use this?”
This involves so many of those important historical thinking skills : making connections, periodization, analyzing sources, and crafting arguments. It sounds like a lot to ask of highschool students, but here is one simple activity I use throughout the year to help them build skills in curating knowledge.
The thinking skill associated with Question Two is interpretation, and in highschool we’re usually interpreting a primarysource document. In the earlier grades we are often looking at a pattern of behavior or an artifact. and it is the most difficult and abstract of the Four Questions.
High schooler Joshua Carter didn’t learn about Black historical figures like Ida B. Wells, Shirley Chisholm or Denmark Vesey from his highschool social studies textbooks. Carter, a rising senior at Teaneck HighSchool in New Jersey, said the app allows him to see people that look like him in a “good light.”
When we do a full Question Two inquiry lab in the classroom we usually work from primarysource documents, especially in the upper grades. But we can also interpret artifacts, images, or patterns of behavior, which is more typical in the lower grades. Whatever the source, the 4QM interpretation process has three steps.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content